Let's dive into the world of music biopics and the recent release, Michael, a film that has sparked curiosity and divided opinions.
The Michael Jackson Phenomenon
Michael, the biopic, takes us on a journey through the life of the iconic Michael Jackson, from his early days with the Jackson 5 to his solo dominance with albums like Off the Wall and Thriller. It's a story that many are familiar with, but the film's approach is what sets it apart.
A Feel-Good Tale or Myth-Making?
The movie falls into the category of biopics that prioritize legend-building over raw truth. It's an interesting choice, especially when compared to other biopics like Bohemian Rhapsody, which dares to explore the complexities of its subject. Michael, on the other hand, paints a picture of Jackson as a pure and innocent soul, almost mythical in nature. This narrative, crafted by the estate, is what the film leans heavily on.
The First Act: A Compelling Start
The film's first act is undoubtedly its strongest. It delves into Jackson's upbringing under the strict and often tyrannical rule of his father, Joe. The threat of violence looms large as Joe pushes his sons towards superstardom. This part of the film is gripping, showcasing the dark side of the Jackson family's rise to fame. Actors like Coleman Domingo, under heavy prosthetics, bring Joe's character to life, leaving a lasting impression.
Jaafar Jackson's Performance: A Highlight
Jaafar Jackson's portrayal of the grown Michael Jackson is a major talking point. His performance is uncanny, capturing Jackson's voice, mannerisms, and dance moves perfectly. However, the film seems content with scratching the surface, offering little insight into the real Jackson beyond what's already been publicly presented.
Director's Choices: A Mixed Bag
Director Antoine Fuqua's choices are intriguing, to say the least. The use of CGI to bring Bubbles the chimp to life and the simplistic portrayal of Jackson's lawyer, John Branca, add a layer of goofiness to the film. The lack of screen time for other Jackson family members, especially Janet, is also notable. The focus remains primarily on Michael and his parents, Joe and Katherine, with the latter portrayed as a saintly figure.
Enjoyable Despite Flaws
Despite its flaws, I found Michael to be an enjoyable watch. The film dedicates a significant portion to celebrating Jackson's musical genius, and it's in these moments that the film truly shines. Watching the creation of iconic albums and performances is a treat, regardless of one's personal opinions about the King of Pop.
A Potential Sequel and Box Office Success
The film's ending, which coincides with the Victory tour in 1984, leaves room for a sequel. It's an open invitation to explore the later years of Jackson's life and the creation of albums like Bad and Dangerous. With the film's box office success seemingly assured, a sequel is a likely prospect, although the challenge of addressing the more controversial aspects of Jackson's life remains.
In conclusion, Michael is a crowd-pleaser, but it's a film that dances around the truth. It's an entertaining watch, but it leaves you wanting more depth and a truer reflection of the complex life it portrays. Personally, I think it's a missed opportunity to explore the full spectrum of Jackson's legacy, but it's a start, and perhaps a sequel will delve deeper.
